Milosevic non riconosce il tribunale che lo sta processando, perchè privo di ogni legittimazione e appartenente a una struttura mediatica...
Belgrade, Sremska No. 6/IV, Serbia – beoforum(a)gmail.com
NOT TO FORGET
NATO AGGRESSION AGAINST SERBIA (FRY), 20 YEARS ON
P R O G R A M
Thursday, 21 March 2019.
Arrival of foreign guests, registration and accommodation
Friday, 22 March 2019
10.00 Opening of the International Conference: NATO aggression 20 years on – Global peace and Prosperity vs. Conflicts and Poverty;
13.00 Lunch, Army House Restaurant
14.30 Continuation of the Conference
18.00 Opening of the exhibition of photographs and documents about NATO aggression, cocktails;
19.30 Opening of the International documentary film review on NATO aggression
Saturday, 23 March 2019.
09.00 International Conference NATO aggression 20 years on – Global Peace and Prosperity vs. Conflicts and Poverty
13.00 Lunch, Army House Restourant
14.30 Continuation of the Conference
Sunday, 24 March 2019
11.00 Visiting Monument to the fallen children in Tashmajdan park
12.00 Visiting Monument to the victims of NATO aggression Eternal fire, Friendship park, New Belgrade
Afternoon and evening farewell and departure of foreign guests.
The organizers of the program are The Belgrade Forum for a World of Equals, the Club of Generals and Admirals of Serbia and the Serbian Hosts Society, under the auspices of The World Peace Council.
"GLOBAL PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT VS. WARS AND DOMINATION "
Causes and geopolitical objectives of NATO 1999 aggression against Serbia (FRY). The role of OSCE (KVM). Rachak “massacre”, alibi Rambouillet “negotiations”;
NATO aggression as the turning point in the world relations NATO’s global expansionist strategy. Militarization, control of natural, economic and strategic resources. Trinity: liberal multinational corporative capitalism – uni-polar World Order – NATO as aggressive alliance;
Europe1999 against Europe. Precedent for globalization of interventionism, destruction of the International Law Order;
Preparedness of the Serbia’s Army, unity of the people;
Blatant interference of the West in the internal affairs of sovereign countries. “Coloured revolutions” – toppling independent and installing quisling leaderships!
The role of NGO and “independent” mass medias ;
Imperial and geopolitical essence of “humanitarian” interventions”;
Plundering of economic and natural resources, global rise of poverty of people and of richness of elite.
Consequences of the blatant violation of the basic principles of the international Law on – Serbia (FRY), the Balkans, Europe and the World Order based on UN Charter. Destroying states, nations and cultures. Redrawing of international borders, opening the door for “Greater Albania”
Humanitarian consequences and casualties – over 4.000 killed, over 12.000 wounded – two thirds of all victims having been civilians;
USA “Bondsteel” base - the beginning of a chain of new USA/NATO bases, militarisation, unchecked NATO expansion to the East, new arms race. The real meaning of “revisionist powers” today?
The consequences of the use of depleted uranium, the toxins released from bombed refineries, transformer stations and chemical factories, cluster bombs; Serbian government measures to establish the truth, alleviate the consequences and affirm responsibility;
Responsibility of NATO member countries for the war damages caused by unauthorised, illegal use of force.
III
What are the roots of the present escalation of mistrust, militarization and confrontation? How to prevent global conflict? The role of UN in preservation of peace and development? The role of the peace movements, mass media, academic communities?
Historical global change: emerging multi polar World Order – vision, obstacles, challenges;
Importance of the basic principle of sovereign equality as opposed to hierarchy, “exceptionality”;
What are the lessons of supporting separatism and terrorism in the province of Kosovo? NATO aggression in 1999.was precedent (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Mali, Syria). Could unilateral illegal secession of Kosovo and Metohija (2008) be kept “unique”?
The need for new disarmament initiatives and closing of foreign military basis;
Indivisibility and equal security for all. NATO offensive military alliance, relic of the Cold War era should be dissolved.
Interdependence between inclusive economic development and sustainable peace. Inclusive socio-economic development, eradication of the roots of social gaps, massive migration and international terrorism.
Improvement and strengthening, not weakening and destruction of universal international organizations (UN, OSCE, UNESCO, WTO).
Bologna, sabato 6 aprile 2019
presso il Centro Katia Bertasi, via A. Fioravanti 22
BOMBE SU BELGRADO: VENT'ANNI DOPO
all'origine delle guerre umanitarie
promuovono:
Coordinamento Nazionale per la Jugoslavia ONLUS
rivista e sito MarxVentuno
rivista e sito Contropiano
[ LEGENDA: + relatori confermati – relatori invitati ]
MATTINO:
Introduzione e saluti:
+ Andrea Catone (rivista Marx21)
– rappresentanza della Ambasciata di Serbia
Sessione IL LAVORO:
+ Rajko Blagojević e Rajka Veljović (sindacalisti JSO-Zastava e associazione UMRS, Kragujevac)
+ Sergio Bellavita (sindacalista, USB)
+ Stefano Verzegnassi (presidente Non Bombe Ma Solo Caramelle ONLUS)
Sessione IL PRESENTE:
+ Andrea Martocchia (segretario Jugocoord Onlus)
+ Jean Toschi Marazzani Visconti (saggista, membro giuria premio "Torre")
+ Zivadin Jovanović (Forum di Belgrado per un Mondo di Eguali)
– Michel Chossudovsky (Global Research Institute)
– Siniša Mihajlović (allenatore del Bologna Calcio)
SESSIONE VIDEO
sui temi: caso Miloševic e "Tribunale" dell'Aia, bombardamenti 1999 e conseguenze, distruzioni del patrimonio artistico e ricolonizzazione in Kosovo; documentario "Tutto sarà dimenticato?"
POMERIGGIO:
Sessione I CRIMINI:
+ Rosa D'Amico (storica dell'arte, Com. scientifico-artistico Jugocoord)
+ Carlo Pona (fisico, Com. scientifico-artistico Jugocoord e "Tribunale Clark")
Sessione CONTRO LE GUERRE:
+ Marinella Correggia (giornalista, Rete No War)
+ Sergio Cararo (rivista e sito Contropiano)
Si raccolgono ulteriori libere adesioni di gruppi, associazioni, partiti, fino al 25 marzo 2019
Presude italijanskih sudova nedvosmisleno potvrđuju da je osiromašeni uranijum direktni uzročnik porasta broja obolelih od malignih oboljenja, pa će ove presude i veštačenja italijanskih lekara poslužiti advokatima koji pripremaju tužbe protiv članica NATO-a zbog bombardovanja Srbije 1999. godine. Tražiće odštetu za građane Srbije obolele od raka i porodice umrlih. Zahtevaće i pomoć u lečenju onih koji se bore sa bolešću.
Roditelji mladog italijanskog vojnika Valeri Melisa iz Kaljarija, koji je 2004, u 27. godini, preminuo od Hočkinovog limfoma, tužili su Ministarstvo odbrane Italije za patnju i duševnu bol. Sud u Kaljariju dosudio je svakom od roditelja po 233.776 evra, a bratu i sestri vojnika po 58.444 evra na ime naknade štete. Ministarstvo odbrane Italije osuđeno je na isplatu ovih odšteta, kao i sudskih troškova u iznosu od 23.352 evra. Sud je utvrdio da je vojnik imao savršeno zdravlje pre nego što je boravio na Kosovu od marta do juna 1999. godine.
– U ratnim dejstvima koja su prethodila intervenciji italijanskog kontingenta na Kosovu korišćene su velike količine naoružanja koje sadrži osiromašeni uranijum – naveli su sudski veštaci i potvrdili da su u telu preminulog vojnika pronađene nanočestice koje se lako udišu i putem krvi brzo stižu do tkiva i svih unutrašnjih organa, uključujući limfne čvorove, polne žlezde i nervno tkivo. Probijaju se unutar ćelija i mogu da izazovu toksične efekte na metabolizmu, na hromozomima i na DNK.
Bolesti su pogodile mnoge italijanske vojnike, pa se ova patologija naziva „balkanski sindrom”, naveli su italijanski doktori Luiđi Bernardini i Đovani Tatareli u veštačenju za sud u Kaljariju, koji je ovu presudu doneo još 2011.. godine. Naglasili su da je Hočkinov limfom vrlo česta pojava među vojnim i civilnim osobljem koje je učestvovalo u misijama na Balkanu.
U presudi Regionalnog upravnog suda pokrajine Kampanije, sa sedištem u Napulju, iz 2009. godine, navodi se da je podnosilac žalbe vojnik Vinčenco Bjondi tada bio jedan od 513 vojnika koji su prijavili patologiju u vezi sa izloženošću osiromašenim uranijumom – takozvanim balkanskim sindromom, koji je izazvan masovnom upotrebom te supstance u naoružanju koje su koristile vojne snage NATO-a tokom intervencija u toj oblasti.
Bjondi je od 2000. do 2002. godine na Kosovu bio odgovoran za čuvanje oružja i eksplozivnih naprava. Ubrzo je oboleo od raka štitne žlezde, zbog čega je operisan i podvrgnut ciklusima hemoterapije. Sudski veštak dr Masimo Niola, profesor Medicinskog fakulteta u Napulju, zaključio je da je uzrok nastanka bolesti – izlaganje oslobođenim jonizujućim zračenjima osiromašenog uranijuma.
Nesumnjivo je da je u nastanku karcinoma imalo udela i Ministarstvo odbrane, jer je i ono direktno koristilo oružje sa osiromašenim uranijumom i nije primenilo odgovarajuće mere da efikasno spreči kontaminaciju sopstvenih vojnika, navodi se u odluci suda, kojom je obolelom vojniku dosuđena odšteta od 9.445 evra, a ministarstvo je pored toga moralo da plati i 2.000 evra za sudske troškove.
Niški advokat Srđan Aleksić kaže da je od raka obolelo 7.600 italijanskih vojnika, od kojih je oko 400 umrlo. U saradnji sa lekarima, pravnicima i vojnim stručnjacima priprema dokumentaciju za tužbe u ime građana Srbije, a jedan od naših čuvenih onkologa, prof. dr akademik Slobodan Čikarić, sproveo je istraživanje i na osnovu egzaktnih podataka tvrdi da je NATO odgovoran za smrt 10.000 do 18.000 stanovnika Srbije i za još 15.000 do 30.000 novoregistrovanih obolelih od malignih tumora od 2001. do 2010. godine u našoj zemlji.
– Na Srbiju je za 78 dana bombardovanja bačeno 15 tona osiromašenog uranijuma. Dugi niz godina se prećutkuje da je to izazvalo pravu humanitarnu i ekološku katastrofu, posebno u Bujanovcu i Vranju – navodi advokat Aleksić.
Projektili sa osiromašenim uranijumom pali su i na njegovo rodno selo Buštranje, u opštini Preševo, zatim na sela Reljan, Bratoselce, Borovac i na brdo Pljačkovica iznad Vranja.
– Pržarsku ulicu u Vranju sada zovu ulicom smrti. Tuda često prolaze sahrane, a u svakoj kući ima bar jedan oboleli od raka – naglašava Aleksić.
Tužbe će, kako kaže, podneti kolege advokati iz evropskih zemalja, ali je stupio u kontakt i sa advokatima na drugim kontinentima, kako bi pravnička javnost u čitavom svetu bila upoznata sa razmerama zločina u Srbiji.
Izvor Politika, 13. februar 2019.
By Srdjan Aleksic and Biljana Ristic
Global Research, January 03, 2019
A legal team is being put together in order to file lawsuits against NATO countries that took part in the 1999 bombing of Serbia. The team of experts is led by Mr Srdjan Aleksic, a well known Nis-based lawyer. The legal team will put together cases backed by firm material evidence, collected from medical documents that indicate a causal relationship between NATO’s use of (depleted) uranium ammunition, and the increased number of cancer cases in Serbia. Mr Aleksic is visiting Melbourne for few days and he has joind us to talk about his initiative in more details.
“Between 10 and 15 tons of uranium have been dropped on the territory of then Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). The number of those ill with cancer is alarming. 2.5 percent of Serbia’s population is diagnosed with malignant diseases each year, i.e.., 33,000 people. One child is diagnosed every day. Since 1999, the number of cancer patients has grown five times. The population is falling ill on a mass scale, especially in southern Serbia and in Kosovo and Metohija,” Aleksic said.
“Our prominent scientists, doctors, oncologists – who have been researching this for years – will take part in preparing the lawsuits. The fact that a court in Italy found the state guilty for sending their Carabinieri to Kosovo and Metohija, to locations attacked with depleted uranium, speaks in favor of the veracity of our claim. 45 soldiers got cancer, and Italy has been paying big damages for this. Our claim is based precisely on this – that even the soldiers who took part in the aggression have gotten sick, and that their countries have been paying damages because of this,” says Aleksic.
According to Aleksic, “it is very important to study and prepare the lawsuits well” – because some others filed against NATO members have been thrown out in the meantime.
There is also a documentary filmed with the support of Serbian lawyer Srdjan Aleksic, whose native village in southern Serbia was bombed during the NATO bombing campaign. As a result, the region’s environment was contaminated with depleted uranium. Aleksic’s mother, just like dozens of his fellow villages, friends and relatives, died of cancer several years after the bombing, his father was also diagnosed with a malicious tumor.
“The “Uranium-238.. My story” documentary tells about NATO bombings and the radioactive pollution of Serbia’s southern regions and the territory of Kosovo and Metohija which were considered environmentally pristine prior to the attack,” Aleksaic said.
By Ekaterina Blinova
Global Research, October 12, 2018
Sputnik International 10 October 2018
Jens Stoltenberg’s claim that NATO “protected” Yugoslavia from the government of Slobodan Milosevic is nothing but propaganda, Christopher C. Black, a Toronto-based international criminal lawyer told Sputnik, stressing that NATO had no legal reason to attack Yugoslavia and de facto committed a war crime against the sovereign nation.
“The NATO attack on Yugoslavia has nothing whatsoever to do with protecting anyone since the claims made by NATO against the government of Yugoslavia were false and were just a pretext for their aggression,” says Christopher C. Black, a Toronto-based international criminal lawyer with 20 years of experience in war crimes and international relations.
Black’s comment comes in response to a statement made by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg who told Serbia’s RTS:
“We are aware in NATO that many people in Serbia still have bad memories about the bombing, the airstrikes in 1999. I stress that we did this to protect civilians and stop the Milosevic regime,” the NATO chief said.
“NATO countries had no legal right to bomb anyone for any reason as that is a violation of international law, the UN Charter, Nuremberg Principles etc.,” the scholar underscored. “Their attack was aggression and therefore a war crime and they committed war crimes during the attack.”
The NATO military campaign against sovereign Yugoslavia codenamed Operation Allied Force kicked off amid the Kosovo war (February, 1998 — June, 1999) between the country’s government forces and Albanian separatists. The alliance’s 78-day air raids resulted in 5,700 civilian deaths, infrastructural damages and contamination of the part of the region with depleted uranium.
Rambouillet Diktat: The Trigger for War
“The real reason NATO attacked is set out in the Rambouillet diktat presented by [then Secretary of State] Madeleine Albright to [then President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Slobodan] Milosevic in early 1999 that Yugoslavia must surrender its sovereignty and allow its total occupation by NATO forces and give up its socialist system for a free enterprise one,” Black said. “If Yugoslavia refused NATO promised to attack. The Yugoslav government had to refuse such a diktat and so NATO attacked.”
Rambouillet Accords envisaged the creation of a de facto independent entity in Kosovo which violated Yugoslavia’s independence and sovereignty.
While the refusal to accept the unacceptable accord was used by the alliance as a trigger for the attack, there were several reasons behind NATO’s invasion, the lawyer explained.
“NATO wanted to establish a base in the Balkans against Russia, to take over mineral resources at the Trepca Mine complex in Kosovo and to destroy the last socialist state in Europe,” the legal practitioner said. “To justify their aggression they concocted the same types of lies against the government as they are now doing against Russia.”
Almost two decades after the NATO bombing, the Trepca mining and metallurgical complex in Kosovo still remains a bone of contention between Pristina and Belgrade. The complex is split between ethnic lines, however, in October 2016 the parliament of the self-proclaimed state of Kosovo voted to take control over the complex despite Serbia’s protests.
When commemorating the enterprise’s 90th anniversary in December 2017 — Europe’s largest lead-zinc and silver ore mine — Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic stressed that Belgrade would continue to fight for it, dubbing the complex “a part of family and national heritage, a part of tradition,” as quoted by Serbian news outlet RTV B92.
NATO’s Expansion in the Balkans
Besides claiming that NATO bombed Yugoslavia to “protect it,” Stoltenberg drew attention to the “close partnership” between NATO and Serbia. Although he noted that the alliance respected Belgrade’s neutrality, the question arises whether that the North Atlantic military bloc is seeking to absorb Serbia in the long run, after admitting Montenegro and signaling readiness to let Macedonia join.
Commenting on the issue, the lawyer recalled that
“the Yugoslav and Serbian government was overthrown in 2000 in a putsch organized by NATO forces and their fascist agents in the group called OTPOR and the DOS organizations which were NATO assets.”
He said that
“the president [was] arrested on false charges and the government [was] taken over by the Quislings of the DOS group.”
According to Black, these groups are still powerful in Serbia. They do not represent aspirations of the Serbian people, he stressed.
Manipulating the Judgments
Black, who has long criticized the imprisonment of Slobodan Milosevic at the International War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague, stressed that the tribunal “manipulated the judgments to put out different stories as it suits them.”
“As I said above the NATO claims were pure propaganda. It was NATO that used force and massive force to destroy a nation that resisted its diktats,” the lawyer highlighted, calling the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) “a NATO tribunal under UN guise.”
“The point is that the charges against Milosevic were bogus, he proved it in his trial,” Black said.
The former Yugoslav president died in his prison cell on March 11, 2006 while on trial for war crimes at the ICTY. Although it was officially stated that Milosevic died from a heart attack the lawyer does not rule out that the ex-Yugoslav leader could have been killed, since “they did not want to release him and could not convict him.”
Corsi e ricorsi storici
Aprile 1999
Un gruppo di Tute Bianche (già Melting Pot, già Invisibili, già Centri Sociali del Nord Est, ogni tanto "Verdi", poi civettuoli con Rifondazione Comunista, più spesso municipalisti, ora Disobbedienti) si affaccia sulla scena internazionale e prende la testa di tutto un movimento di pacifisti, Terzo Settore, buonisti, preti, nonviolenti, che si precipita a Sarajevo a suonare la grancassa umanitaria che ottunda la nostra percezione delle bombe e dei secessionismi etnico-mafiosi in procinto di squartare una grande e nobile paese, la Jugoslavia.
Inalberano i vessilli della civiltà interetnica e multiculturale che abbaglia le moltitudini.
Diffondono lo slogan CIA del "despota sanguinario" Milosevic, accreditano invenzioni delle agenzie di disinformazione USA poi smentita dagli stessi investigatori ONU e, in piena guerra di sterminio NATO contro la Serbia si presentano in 4 a Belgrado per blaterare alla Tv di Stato stereotipi diffamatori contro il governo.
Vengono rispediti al confine. E gli è andata bene.
Ad Aviano, nella grande manifestazione contro la guerra NATO assaltano un gruppetto di compagni che alzavano una bandiera jugoslava.
Altri gli tengono bordone, vietando ai propri associati o iscritti di invitare le comunità serbe in Italia alle manifestazioni contro l'aggressione.
In piena guerra e dopo, scambiano inviti e stringono rapporti con l'opposizione capitalista e filoamericana, capeggiata dall'organizzazione dei fighetti serbi di "OTPOR", messa in piedi e addestrata dalla CIA.
I loro amici più stretti sono quelli della Radio B92, radio del circuito CIA "Free Europe", che organizza pogrom contro gli operai e i contadini che ricordano Tito (vedi il filmatino B92 che circola nei centri sociali dei Disobbedienti).
Quando una vera teppaglia guidata da Otpor assalta armata il Parlamento e brucia le schede che avevano decretato la vittoria di comunisti e socialisti alle Elezioni Parlamentari, questo conglomerato dei diritti umani inneggia a "Belgrado che ride" e alla "Rivoluzione Democratica".
Quando dopo un po' Milosevic viene rapito e venduto per 30 milioni di dollari al tribunale USA della Del Ponte, dove disintegra tutte le accuse e i testimoni addestrati da CIA e MI5 e le ribalta sui veri criminali di guerra.
Quando a Belgrado si insedia la mafia e il paese va a catafascio tra svendite del patrimonio industriale e smantellamento di uno stato discretamente sociale che aveva resistito a guerre e embarghi, tutto tace.
Della Jugoslavia non parla più nessuno.
Tanto meno i fiancheggiatori della dissoluzione della Jugoslavia.